The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016
The pie chart represents about money rate which a young child's unobtrusive stayed in America waste and accepted in 2016.
Overall, fountained of earnings have a lot of resources from several catetegories, whereas expansed activities the most lower than income activites. However, both of two types it that showed fairly similarly final cost.
In term of revenue sources, resources that had from six different fount, the higher income was became from donated food, the percentage indicated 86.6% and that was proved the larger number than another shapes. Moreover, the profit come from investment and goverment grants was the lower than several categories with 0.2% representative. For all categories was sucsess gather the biggest amount with total income 53.561.580 USD.
Furthermore, expenditure categories only have three categories that can supported all activities. The most higher for spending money was in program services which the rate almost 100% that was 95.8%, the rated demonstrated this categories was dominant than another types with the same circle. While, management and general categories only indicated 1.6% spiring the money and this number became the lower percentage in this category. From all categories, expenditure have total outplay of 53.224.896 USD which is the number almost balancing total of revenue sources.
- Some people say that youngsters should take part time job while study in University Do you agree or disagree 56
- Due to the development of the internet public libraries are no longer necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The percentage of women going into higher education in five countries 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...gories, whereas expansed activities the most lower than income activites. However, both of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'founts'.
Suggestion: founts
..., resources that had from six different fount, the higher income was became from dona...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... different fount, the higher income was became from donated food, the percentage indic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han another shapes. Moreover, the profit come from investment and goverment grant...
^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... that can supported all activities. The most higher for spending money was in program servi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... that was 95.8%, the rated demonstrated this categories was dominant than another ty...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6938627259 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5254139052 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0639748984853 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302904623846 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471806173413 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576153022753 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060331620195 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.