The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
The pie charts demonstrate the amount of revenue a children’s charity in USA received from different sources and the money they spent in the year 2016.
From the chart for revenue sources, it is clear that most of the money received is from donated food, which accounts for 86.6% of the revenue in 2016. For the rest of the revenue sources, community contribution has earned the charity a considerable proportion of money, 10.4%. Program revenue accounts for a small percentage (2.2%). Investment income, government grants and other income each contribute insignificant portion of money, in total less than 1%.
As it can be seen from the expenditure chart of the charity, majority of the money is spent in program services, which is 95.8%. Little amount is spent in fundraising (2.6%) and Management and General purposes (1.6%).
Comparing the two charts, it is evident that most of the revenue earned by the charity is spent in different puroses in that year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Bhanu Kishore | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Aron | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes ( for example working for a charity, improvement of the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children. 61
- The diagrams below show the statges and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 96
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 87
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pent in different puroses in that year.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76583509089 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9638467647 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313273885222 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137428428017 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146209338357 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22615699758 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163503419161 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.