The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table given illustrates consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Looking at the table it is readily clear that for all five countries people spent most on Food/Drinks/Tobacco. People in Turkey spent the most percentage of the national consumer expenditure in 2002, 32.14%. Second to Turkey in this category is Ireland, where people spent 28.91% of the total money on these items. The other three countries, Italy, Spain and Sweden had their percent expenditure roughly in the same region, all below 20%.
In terms of Clothing/Footwear, among all countries, Italian consumers devoted the most of their expenditure on them, 9%. The other 4 countries’ people spent around the same proportion of the money, all close to 6%.
Leisure/Education expenditure was the least expenditure in all the 5 countries listed, with Turkey spending the most, 4.35%, followed by Sweden and Italy, both spending about the same percentage (3.22% and 3.20% respectively). Ireland and Spain both spent around 2% of their national consumer expenditure. Comparing Leisure/Education expenditure with other categories, all five countries spent significantly less fraction of their money on leisure or education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computers is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Other disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- chinese urban expenditure 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...national consumer expenditure. Comparing Leisure/Education expenditure with other...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5935828877 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32916799622 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4811347355 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242629765167 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120670655394 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192780394306 0.0843802449381 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238923147311 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.262028618223 0.0819641961636 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.