The given pie chart display details of entire value along with sources of fish brought from various nations to the US in the middle of 1988 and 2000. Details can be depicted by the rendered pie chart and table. The data has been calibrated in numbers and percentage correspondingly.
It is crystal clear that from staring with 1988, 6.57 billions dollars spent on fish for importing in US. However, There is a slightly increase noticed to 8.52 billion dollars after 4 years. Nevertheless in 2000 there had been a moderate increase up to 10.72 billion dollars. Moving towards the pie chart gives an interesting glimpse of the information that in 1988, 60% fishes been brought to US from Canada. Whereas, from China there were only about 15% moving further to other nations, it comprised to 27%. Analysing further in 1992 massive rise seen to 46% from other nation along with china also moved to 20%. Whereas Canada decreased to 34%. Referring in 2000 gradually drop noticed to 42%. However China keep increasing to 30. Nevertheless the percentage of Canada reduce to 28%.
To cap it all, it can be vividly manifested that US increase there import of fish to other nations through out the span.
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements Others however think that mental attitude is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... for importing in US. However, There is a slightly increase noticed to 8.52 billion dollars after 4...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... to 8.52 billion dollars after 4 years. Nevertheless in 2000 there had been a moderate incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion along with china also moved to 20%. Whereas Canada decreased to 34%. Referring in 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... in 2000 gradually drop noticed to 42%. However China keep increasing to 30. Neverthele...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...%. However China keep increasing to 30. Nevertheless the percentage of Canada reduce to 28%....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...e there import of fish to other nations through out the span.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8487804878 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52555764217 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9089924676 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6428571429 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281404744954 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079213330569 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102344275176 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187247806468 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640697028238 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.