The given pie charts demonstrate three main sources of fish imported to America from 1988 to 2000. Meanwhile, the table describes the data about the total import index of fish to the US in 3 examined years.
Overall, there was a dramatic increase in the revenue of fish imported to the US over a 12-year period. It can also be seen that China exported the lowest proportion of fish to America between 1988 and 2000.
According to the data shown on the table, the import of fish to the US had a tendency to grow during the period of 12 years. To be more specific, in 1988, the total value of imported fish was only 6.57 billion dollars. After 4 years, the figure experienced a slight rise at the threshold of 8.52 billion dollars. At the end of the period, Americans consumed the amount of fish imported, which was equivalent to 10.72 billion dollars in terms of value.
Furthermore, the UK mainly imported fish from 3 different sources, namely China, Canada and the others. During the examined period, the percentage of fish imported from Canada tended to decline significantly, from 60% in 1988 to 34% in 1992 and eventually reached the lowest figure at 28% in 2000. In contrast, the amount of Chinese fish breaking into American market sharply rose in 3 years, at 13%, 20% and 30% respectively. Similarly, the remaining countries also exported a soaring amount of fish to meet the demand of the American people. At the beginning, the proportion of fish imported was only 27% of the total, but at the end of the period, this figure was nearly twice as much as the data in 1988, reaching a peak of 42% of the total.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62283737024 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53715579277 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491349480969 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1545391475 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.769230769 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344189009432 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13096068381 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982085475657 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251124524237 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127608247604 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.