The pie charts and table illustrate the share of living accommodation in five types occupied by 25-year-olds and the availability of four kinds of accommodations in London in the period 1990s and 2010s.
The pie charts and table illustrate the share of living accommodation in five types occupied by 25-year-olds and the availability of four kinds of accommodations in London in the period 1990s and 2010s.
Overall, the accommodation in alone buildings and parents' buildings tended to decrease, whereas the respective figures for shared houses and flats have a significant rise during these periods due to the availability in related accommodation between the 1990s and 2010s.
In particular, there was a noticeable increase in the proportion of people who lived in shared houses from 25% in the 1990s to about 45% in the 2010s as the numbers of 1-2 bedroom houses have fallen considerably from 34,000 in the 1990s to only 12,000 in the 2010s onwards. Meanwhile, the percentage of alone flats has also risen almost third times from 15% in the 1990s into 40% in the 2010s as the under two-bedroom flats, at the same time, has declined from 32,000 to 10,000.
However, the numbers of alone accommodations such alone houses and flats have a trend to decrease rapidly from 5% and 20% to approximate 3% and 5%, respectively. This is due to the stability of 3-4 accommodations throughout the two periods at about 47,000 for 3-4 houses and 32,000 for 3-4 flats. Finally, people who lived with parents also have reduced from over a quarter in the 1990s to just around 20% in the 2010s onwards.
- The pie charts and table illustrate the share of living accommodation in five types occupied by 25-year-olds and the availability of four kinds of accommodations in London in the period 1990s and 2010s. 73
- The bar chart below shows the types of music bought in the USA in 2010 by age group Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Children should allow every parents' advice. 50
- 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, third, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94893617021 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86294760527 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502127659574 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4883436327 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.142857143 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392827797505 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225490532884 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.320305657694 0.0843802449381 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355992150984 0.15604864568 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.37366014827 0.0819641961636 456% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.