The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts compare the percentage of the number of people who live in five different areas all over the world, including Europe, North America, Latin America & Caribbean, Middle East and North Africa, the Asia Pacific in the timescale of a century from 1900 to 2000.
Overall, while the rate of people who lived in Asia and Europe occupied the world population, people lived in other countries experienced a slight fluctuation over the period surveyed.
Look at the pie chart for more detail, we can see that the Asia Pacific hold the lion’s share, with 60% (in 1900) and 54% (in 2000), compared to the other regions in the world. In the meantime, Europe was the runner-up, with a considerable decrease from 25% (in 1900) to 14% (in 2000).
As can be seen in the chart, the proportion of residents in North America leveled off throughout the period, with 5% in both years. A difference was recorded in Latin America & Caribbean and Africa with an upward trend in the share of inhabitants, beginning at 3% and 4% (in 1900) and increasing to 8% and 10%, respectively at the end of the survey. The striking feature was seen in the Middle East and North Africa, with significant growth to 6% in 2000 from scratch.
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 84
- While people consider global warming. Discuss both views 84
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71830985915 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6176337578 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5624525153 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104798944314 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521287385896 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344637361684 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673866981672 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408538865276 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.