The pie charts below the percentage of coffee productions from different regions and the profits in 2014.
The pie charts illustrate the differences and changes in the proportions of coffee productions from different areas and the profits in 2014. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that South America was the dominant producer and Europeans consumed the highest amount of coffee. Additionally, the profit from retailing was the highest percentage.
In particular, when it comes to the sources of coffee production, the percentage of South America was at nearly a half, which was the highest score, followed by Southeast Asia with 20%. Besides, the third largest proportion was 15%, which was represented by Oceania. It was accompanied by Africa and other producers at 10% and 9% respectively.
In terms of the consumption of coffee, the first and second top positions were Europe and America with 44% and 25% correspondingly, followed by other countries with just over 10%. Oceania and Asia shared the equal amount of coffee at 10%, which accounted for the lowest proportions.
Regarding the profits of coffee production, Retailing dominated all the patterns of profits with around 30%. The second and the third percentages were 27% and 25%, which was represented by Producing process and Importing accordingly. The least profit earners could be seen in Shipping with 15%, which was just a half in comparison with Retailing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25352112676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91351531514 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4099469691 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210646325024 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962355012773 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152009776107 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136445635056 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136575430552 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.