The pie charts give the information about the household spending on five different categories in two regions in 2000.
It is clearly seen that people in both regions spent most of their money on housing, food and other goods. On contrary, the expenditure on clothing and transport only accounts for a small part.
In the UK, other goods ranked first in the portion of the household spending, with 36%. While in Hong Kong, obviously more citizens were willing to spent a major part of their money on housing (32%), which was 14% more than that in Britain. The food expenditure in Britain and Hong Kong counts for 22% and 27%, respectively.
On the other hand, the expenditure on transport in Britain was 17%, just 1% lower than housing. But this figure saw a relatively small percentage in Hong Kong, which was 9%. Clothing expense was in the last place in both regions, accounting a percentage of 7% in Britain and 4% in Hong Kong.
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village. 73
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one s own family Why might people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 31
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7256097561 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5437501416 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8225164044 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270999916315 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106815338669 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675021169703 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15067445731 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690672883217 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.