The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the proportion of spending on different categories in an average family in a nation in two years 1950 and 2010.
It is clear the percentage of housing experienced a significant decrease in the period shown, but the opposite was true for the figure for food. In addition, the figure for education and health care were the lowest.
In 1950, the proportion of housing was highest at 72.1% of total household expenditures, while the figure for food and education was significantly lower at 11.2% and 6.6% respectively. By contrast, the figure for Heath care and Transportation were lowest at 2.4% and 3.3% respectively. Meanwhile, only 4.4% of total spending was on Other.
In 2020, the proportion of Food was rapidly increased to more than 20% to 34% of total household expenditures and became the highest figure in the chart. This year experienced a significant decrease to 22% of housing, while the figure for Other decreased to 19.2%. At the same time, the figure for transportation and health care were slightly raised at 14% and 4.5% respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for education slightly went down at 6.3%.
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- In some parts of the world, it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 61
- Some people think that individuals are born to be leaders others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h care and Transportation were lowest at 2.4% and 3.3% respectively. Meanwhile, o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98319809927 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3292697678 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103571926724 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461469758464 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829326095118 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910855053086 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100227332005 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.