The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie charts compares the items people living in a territory spent their budget for in 1950 and 2010.
Overall, housing in 1950 was the highest expensed category while food stood at the second position over the same year.
On the contrary, in 2010 this trend reversed making food the highest contributor as the housing made up the second-highest expensed proportion. Meanwhile, other items witnessed different changes in terms of percentage although education's contribution remained static.
In 1950, housing accounted for the largest proportion at 72,1% However, this category decreased dramatically reaching 22% in 2010. In contrast, the share of food witnessed an increase of almost 23% making it the largest proportion in 2010. Likewise, nevertheless the budget allocated to the health care improved by 22 in 2010, it still accounted for the smallest contributor.
Two other remarkable surge was for other and also transportation categories which over the span of 20 years they reached %19.2 and %14 of total expenditure, respectively. Although there was a marginal deterioration in education contributor, it stood at somewhat a stable position by relatively %6.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | lennie.butera | view | |
| 2021-08-25 | Amelie | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | prathamp114 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 84
- In the number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money and constructing new railways lines for very fast trains others believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport discuss both views and give 84
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided pie charts compares the ite...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent their budget for in 1950 and 2010. Overall, housing in 1950 was the highest...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucations contribution remained static. In 1950, housing accounted for the large...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counted for the smallest contributor. Two other remarkable surge was for other...
^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'surge' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'surges'.
Suggestion: surges
... contributor. Two other remarkable surge was for other and also transportation c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, still, while, as for, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51648351648 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06796183288 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.6642206553 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941959328781 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426712306245 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421741667512 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580327836785 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475489693095 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.