The given pie graph illustrates the average expenditures for each household in Java and Malaysia in 2010.
It is clear that householders in both countries spent the largest proportion of their income on just three categories - housing, food, other good and services. The percentage figures for spending on transport and healthcare was the lowest.
In Malaysian households, the highest category was housing, which represented 34% of the total expenditure. This figure was higher than in Japan, with just 21% spent on housing. Japanese householders paid the highest proportion on a range of other good and services, at 29%, which was slightly more than in Malaysia. In term of food, the figures for both nations were similar, at 24% and 27% for Malaysia and Japan respectively.
Expenditure on health care was the lowest category. In Japan, this accounted for 6% of the total, while 20% of household spending went on transport. These figures were exactly double those shown for Malaysia.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25157232704 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83911710528 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4562782833 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19390985098 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082417873863 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965400565635 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153933080145 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122309543659 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.