The pie charts compare the average proportion of expenses spent on 5 different categories of household needs (housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services) in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that a large proportion of the expenditures for both countries were on three categories (housing, food and other good and services) in the given period. Furthermore, a small portion of the total outlay is on health care and transportation with health care accounting for the least expenditure in the two countries.
The major spending in Japanese homes was apportioned for other goods and services which accounted for 29% of the total expenditures, while the Malaysians spend approximately a third of their earnings on housing. The second major household expenditure for both countries is on food with the Japanese spending 3% less than their Malaysian counterpart at 24%. Conversely, the third major outflow is housing for Japan at 21% and it accounts for roughly a quarter of all spending in Malaysia (26%).
On the other hand, the lowest expenditures in both countries are on health care and transportation with Japan spending twice as much on both categories than Malaysia with the expenditure on health care was at 6% and 3% respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is on food with the Japanese spending 3% less than their Malaysian counterpart at...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, second, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99400762067 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490476190476 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0661183062 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.285714286 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185940211162 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983216594143 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108264209076 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144551466613 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12094230775 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.