The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of energy produced in 1995 and 2005 in France...
It's clear that Gas and Coal are the 2 main energy resources. and they their creation. had a small growth. in the period of 10 year, while the generation of Petrol Saw a noticeable fall during the same time.
In the first year, gas and coal take up the highest percentage of all the sum of these 2 accounted for more than half of the pie chart . After ten years, in 2005, the proportion of gas and coal still occupied the most important. position even though the figures of gas and coal just rose by over 1%
Turning into the other kinds of energy resources: There are significant changes in the figures of petrol nuclear and other produced. An mark fall of nearly 10% was witnessed in the percentage of generation of petrol in France, The proportion of nuclear and other kind the French created both rose from a low of 6.4% and 4.9% to a high of 10% and 9.10% in 2005
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 61
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- process of Pe uh raw tea and ripe tea 73
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of east a frica 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y produced in 1995 and 2005 in France... Its clear that Gas and Coal are the 2 ma...
^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...d Coal are the 2 main energy resources. and they their creation. had a small growth...
^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Had
...rgy resources. and they their creation. had a small growth. in the period of 10 yea...
^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hey their creation. had a small growth. in the period of 10 year, while the genera...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nted for more than half of the pie chart . After ten years, in 2005, the proportio...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Position
...coal still occupied the most important. position even though the figures of gas and coal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...s of petrol nuclear and other produced. An mark fall of nearly 10% was witnessed i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39664804469 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36133332288 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.9656776126 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131323630233 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517987336278 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523646336612 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881201898136 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041800182377 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.