The pie charts demonstrate the differentiation of manufacturing of several types of energy in France in two particular years.
Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that the production of coal, gas and nuclear power had grown comparing with the previous decade, and coal remained the topmost produced energy in two years, while the manufacture of petro climbed down from the former amount.
Regards with, in 1995 France made 29.80 percent of coal which was the highest of all other energies. Though, after 10 years it increased over 1 percent, nevertheless, it stayed with the first place. In the case of gas which had a similar trend as coal and production upgraded from 29.63 to 30.31 percent.
Turning to the other features, if we considered the difference in terms of the ratio of rising, then nuclear power had increased almost 4 or more times than the others and climbed up from 6.40 to 10.10 percent. While all the features had the trend to go upright but in the case of petro opposite trend was observed. Its amount of production shifted down to almost 10 percent from the previous decade. Other energy also rose a lot.
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in 3 areas of a city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extend do you agree 61
- The bar graph below represents the data about the clubs joined by the people of two different age groups at a leisure center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ce in two particular years. Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that the p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83163265306 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56215427468 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3465333596 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149233739667 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679404380364 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731526975781 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115644881325 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870509638501 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.