The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented pie chart compares New Zealand and Germany in terms of electricity units generated by 5 sources in 1980 and 2010.
Generally, fuel production in both nations expanded after 30 years. However, there were significant differences between their major and minor sources for electricity generation.
Turning into detail, during the period, nuclear power was not applied to electricity production in New Zealand. By contrast, coal became the source occupying the largest percentage among the 4 remaining categories, with 56 units in 1980, which grew almost three times to reach 150 units in 2010. Regarding to hydro and natural gas, they shared equal amounts of 30 units produced in 1980, but expressed opposite trends in 2010: while 46 units were generated by hydro, the figure for natural gas plunged to only 2 units. Likewise, electricity produced by petroleum also decreased considerably to obtain the similar amount with that of natural gas in 2010.
Unlike New Zealand, production in Germany covers all 5 sources. Moreover, starting at 20 units in 1980, electricity generated by nuclear power increased significantly to 155 units in 2010, becoming the biggest sources among 5 sectors. Likewise, a considerable gain is witnessed in fuel produced by petroleum, with a growth from 22 units to 27 units after 30 years. By contrast, natural gas and hydro were 2 sources expressing substantial decline, from 28 units and 7 units in 1980, respectively, to equal amounts of 2 units in 2010. The only sectors which remained unchanged over the period is coal, with 28 units of generated fuel in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-25 | Minh Pham | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | phuong cao | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behavior while others say the amount of time they spend watching TV influences their behavior. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school is planned for the area. The map shows to possible sites for the school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... units of generated fuel in both years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21072796935 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81386781093 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4549553543 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189120574967 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931498591006 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102933595192 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174739151778 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13733738596 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.