The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates comparison between three countries on basis of their techniques to deal with waste products.
Overall, it is evident that every nations major way of treating the waste is different, depending upon the technologies and convenience. In republic of Korea, 69% of the waste is recycled which indicates that Koreans prefer sustainable option which causes less damage to the environment. On the contrary, Sweden recycles only quarter of its waste while recycling is not even considered in United Kingdom.
Furthermore, burying the waste underground is the most preferred option in United Kingdom with 82% of the garbage being buried while, more than half of Sweden's waste is buried underground. In contrast, only 22% of Korea's waste is deposited underground. Although, 20% of Sweden's waste is incinerated, at the same time, only 9% of the waste is destroyed by fire in Korea and mere 2% is burnt in United kingdom.
To conclude, Each country has its own specific way of dealing with waste products but, Republic of Korea is the only country which emphasizes on sustainable practices rather than destroying products and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | appollo abu | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | kaur g | 56 | view |
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 82
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker someone you work closely with Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are import 56
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28804347826 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8910131841 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8960063673 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105140587094 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506185669424 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337035665944 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774889680841 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306580280011 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.