The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts provide a comparison of a problem such as dealing with dangerous waste among three nations namely Sweden, Republic of Korea and United Kingdom.
Overall, it is conspicuous that there are dramatical difference in the number of dangerous waste in three countries. While recycling is hosted the highest rank in Republic of Korea, waste from underground in UK and Sweden are superior to the others.
Taking a first look at the pie chart of Korea and Sweden, it is clear that recycling in Korea is 69% whereas Sweden account for a quarter. Following that, dangerous waste from underground is hosted the second highest in Korea and at the first top in Sweden which is more than half. Finally, waste caused from burning is just less than one tenth in Korea which is less than 2 times when compared with Sweden.
Moving to the UK pie chart, there are 5 reasons cause dangerous waste in this nation and the data of waste from underground still come as the first. It is obvious that underground waste in UK makes up more than 80% while the others waste just less than one tenth. The proportion of waste in chemical treatment and dump at the sea met at the same record. Consequently, burning waste stand at the last rank in this country, which is merely 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | appollo abu | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | kaur g | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, look, second, so, still, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67555555556 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42293567474 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497777777778 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4446155865 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130682460588 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630316306559 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035793604716 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947908739957 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225826690417 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.