The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The given bar graph provides the comparison of the global sales among four types of digital games over 7-year period.
Overall, it is obvious that handheld games hosted the highest rank during 7 years. Three of four digital games witnessed the upward trend whereas the console games observed the reversed pattern over the years shown.
According to the supplied data, there were merely 2 types of digital games called console games and handheld games in 2000, whose sales is 6 and 12 billion dollars respectively. Subsequently, there were the existence of mobile phone games and online games in 2002, with these numbers of sales met at the same record. While the sales of handheld game in 2003 reached nearly 15 billion dollars and was roughly more than 2 times when compared with the remaining sales which were under 6 billion dollars.
Moving to the sales in 2004, surprisingly, the number of sales in mobile phone games, online games, console games experienced the upward trend and had the similar pattern in 2004. The handheld game had the same trend and still came as the first rank in sales. While most of types of digital games saw a growth in sales except for console games. The sales of console games fall from 5 billion dollars in 2004 to 4 and 3 billion dollars in the next two years. Finally, sales in three out of four digital games increase slightly after 2004 and the handheld games was the most preferred games at all, with the recorded number in sales was reach peak at 18 billion dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-05 | quytnee | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Nguyenmay | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | Nguyenmay | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Phạm Thùy Linh | view | |
| 2020-12-10 | Phạm Thùy Linh | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the types') or simply say ''most types''.
Suggestion: most of the types; most types
... came as the first rank in sales. While most of types of digital games saw a growth in sales ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'game'.
Suggestion: game
...for console games. The sales of console games fall from 5 billion dollars in 2004 to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, still, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 937.175257732 134% => OK
No of words: 263.0 206.0 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76425855513 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22257575647 2.54303337028 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 127.690721649 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486692015209 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 290.88556701 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7349265651 44.8134815571 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 76.5299724578 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 4.34317383033 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367274785797 0.216113520407 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165876677029 0.0766984524023 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953408192455 0.0603063233224 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246835981926 0.12726935374 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822313429316 0.0580467560999 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.