The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002.
The graphs compare the amount of 8 different waste products produced by typical households in California in two separate years, 1985 and 2002.
Overall, of the eight waste materials thrown out wood, glass, papers and metals' figures are the only ones that increased, whereas the proportion for textile, kitchen/organic waste and dust and cinders decreased significantly. It is also noticeable that the percentage for plastic remained stable over a 17 year period.
The numbers for both glass and metals showed a significant rise of 10% in 2002 to 12% and 16% respectively. Papers were the most common waste product in both years, which percentage rose from just over a third to 44%, while the amount of wood displayed a negligible growth of 1% in 2002.
Among the 3 categories of household wastes that declined, kitchen/organic waste had the most dramatic drop from 28% to 4% in 2002. Dust and cinders comprised the next highest reduction in percentage and fell by 4%, and textile dropped by only 1%. The figure for plastic maintained the same with 7% after 17 years.
- The pie charts below indicate the primary uses of the internet in Japan in the years 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The charts below show the males and females arrested over five years and the reasons for the most recent arrests. 78
- Some people say that dangerous sports should be banned Do you agree or disagree 77
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad the most dramatic drop from 28% to 4% in 2002. Dust and cinders comprised the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01117318436 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82589911611 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2081494554 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16922215874 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067840048382 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436630568869 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105155291488 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341775175855 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.