The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The table compares the proportion of the population who are 65 and over in Canada, Germany and the UK in 1998, 2000 and predicted values in 2030.
Overall, the number of the aging population in all countries is projected to increase from1988 to 2030. The highest population of elderly people was in Germany, which will remain the highest in 2030, while the lowest aging population can be seen in the United Kingdom over the period given.
Between 1988 and 2000, the proportion of elderly people in Germany and Canada rose by roughly 5% to 25.32% and 20.67% respectively. With regard to the UK, the figure of people aged 65 and above had relatively little change and remained as just under 15% in both years.
By 2030, Germany and Canada's aging population will grow by approximately 5.5% to 30.42% and 26.45% respectively. The number of people aged 65 and more in the UK will have a significant growth to just over a fifth.
- The bar below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
- Some people believe that the government should make university education free for all Others disagree and say that students should pay for their own education 78
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001 82
- The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 61
- The line graph below shows how much money was spent on cars in four different countries in Asia 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...mpares the proportion of the population who are 65 and over in Canada, Germany and the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79012345679 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58594090856 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6449796158 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218946853047 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10303641456 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596612211295 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13451500589 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216261121039 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.