The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts illustrate the expenditure of a UK school, divided into five categories, between 1981 and 2011.
Looking at 3 pie charts, it is immediately obvious that the percentage of Teacher's salaries was the top spending of all sector, whist the figure of Insurance was the lowest number. Moreover, money usage of other worker's salaries in 1981 was as double as the percentage of in the last year.
It is noticeable that money paid for teacher stood at 40% in 1981, following by a slightly climb by 5% at 1981, The figure fall at 45% in the year 2001. Similarly, the proportions of 2 others sector such as Insurance and Furniture and equipment shared an upward trend by 6% and 8% respectively.
Now , turning to the details of spending on other worker's salaries which was fall significantly by nearly a half number of it, from 28% to 15% in 30 year period. Moreover, at the same time the proportion money spending on resources e.g books register a violently decreased from 15% to 9%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | shayma | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Miss Zune | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money usage of other workers salaries in 1981 was as double as the percentage of ...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
...cher stood at 40% in 1981, following by a slightly climb by 5% at 1981, The figure fall at 45% i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 4, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rend by 6% and 8% respectively. Now , turning to the details of spending on o...
^^
Line 13, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was fall significantly by nearly a half number of it, from 28% to 15% in 30 year...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76852676422 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9045721867 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182970588955 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820935475812 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825420962154 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1218576555 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872744388144 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.