The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts illustrate the expenditure of a UK school, divided into five categories, between 1981 and 2011.
Looking at 3 pie charts, it is immediately obvious that the percentage of teachers' salaries represented the highest expenditure of all sectors, while the number of insurances was the lowest. Moreover, the use of other workers' salaries in 1981 was double the percentage in 2001.
It is notable that the money paid by teachers stood at 40% in 1981, followed by a slight increase of 5% in 1981. The figure fell to 45% in 2001. Similarly, the proportions of 2 other sectors such as Insurance and Furniture and equipment shared an upward trend of 6% and 8%, respectively.
Now, turning to the details of the expenditure on salaries of other workers, which have fallen by almost half, from 28% to 15% over a 30-year period. Moreover, the share of money spent on resources, such as books, fell violently from 15% to 9%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | shayma | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Miss Zune | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, the use of other workers salaries in 1981 was double the percentage in 2001. ...
^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s books, fell violently from 15% to 9%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, similarly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87577639752 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7942165825 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4422026344 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173330865899 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755643130221 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857550520788 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114051628414 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984804724353 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.