the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The charts below contrast the amount of electricity output by fuel origins in France and Australia in the years 1980 and 2000. All in all, this trend has been approximately doubled between these years from 100 parts to 170 in Australia and from 90 parts to 180 in France. It is obviously showed that the sources that these two country relied on were completely dissimilar. France counted on nuclear but Australia counted on coal in 2000
In 1980 in Australia the most commonly power source for generating electricity was coal (50 units) and 50 units remaining includes natural gas and hydro power (each one 20 units) and oil only taken 10 units. The second chart of Australia elucidate that coal was the dominant fuel just above 75% and something about 20% left was occupied by hydro power.
In contrary coal and natural gas were consumed in an identical percentage (25 sections roughly) in France in1980. 40 sections remaining were almost produced by oil and nuclear energy. Next pie in 2000 illustrate that 126 section of 180 were created by nuclear source which was not even used in Australia. Oil and coal were totally used up 50% together. Other origins were not as remarkable as others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-08 | golarghavan | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | javad_70 | 61 | view |
- Most people argue that the high sales of some popular consumer good reflects the power of advertising not the real need of consumers. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than the secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- IN THE LAST FEW DECADES THE NUMBER OF STAY-AT-HOME DADS HAS BEEN INCREASING NOTICIBLY.WHY IS IT happening?IS IT A MORE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE PHENOMENON? 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the diagrams below shows a company s recruitment process write a report for university lecturer describing this process 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar but Australia counted on coal in 2000 In 1980 in Australia the most commonly p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46053925402 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590243902439 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3880281488 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209329658447 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794940158501 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935562473466 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138299042317 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628301025703 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.