The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts describe units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. Overall, it is clear that the number of total electricity production in both countries showed an upward trend during the twenty years, from 100 units to 170 units in Australia and from 90 units to 180 units in France.
Starting with Australia, coal produced the largest amount of electricity in 1980, at 50 units. Then its production rose dramatically to 130 units in 2000, which was still at the highest position. Meanwhile, the same trend can be seen in hydro power, from 20 units to 36 units. However, the production of electricity by natural gas and oil declined to the lowest position (2 units) in 2000.
Turning now to France, the amount of electricity created by nuclear power increased significantly to the highest point (126 units) in 2000 from 15 units in 1980. At the same time, a slight rise can also be seen in oil from 20 units to 25 units. By contrast, the two decades witnessed a decrease in natural gas(25—2 units) and hydro power(5—2 units). The electricity production by coal remained stable in the meantime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the lowest position 2 units in 2000. Turning now to France, the amount of ele...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81725888325 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69541713266 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0908541135 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427108870484 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186161492938 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193960638116 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311743596084 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143609059673 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.