The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The charts compare the units of electricity produced in different ways in Australia and France in the year of 1980 and 2000.
Coal was the main sources of electricity in Australia in both years, creating 50 units and 130 units respectively, while in France, the amount of electricity produced by this kind of fuel was just half of that of Australia in 1980 and remained unchanged during the two decades. Most of the electricity in France came from nuclear power, which more than doubled from 25 units in 1980 to 126 units in 2000. In contrast, Australia did not produce electricity in this way.
Hydropower was the second most important fuel source in Australia in 2000, which produced one-fifth of the total amount of electricity (36 units), rising from 20 units in 1980. In France, however, it was much more trivial, generating a mere of 5 units and 2 units in 1980 and 2000 respectively. The figures for natural gas have shown a similar pattern in both countries, falling from 20 units to 2 units in Australia and from 25 units to 2 units in France. On the contrary, oil gained more importance in France, with the amount rising from 20 units to 25 units from 1980 to 2000, while falling sharply from 10 units to 2 units in Australia.
Overall, coal produced the largest amount of electricity in Australia while nuclear power was its counterpart in France, which did not even exist in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | J a Hermione | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 79
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- Nowadays distance learning programs have gained in popularity but some people argue that courses can never be taken as good as those by attending a college or university in person To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73469387755 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65329983228 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440816326531 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5553333329 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.888888889 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374166144225 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204741959028 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844000313676 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275477925938 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108895440396 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.