The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The pie charts depict how many units of electricity were generated in Australia and France with the help of five sources of fuel in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, between these years, electricity generation in Australia and France had risen. Amongst them, coal was the most preferred in both the years for the former country, whereas nuclear power became the predominant source in the latter one.
First of all, in Australia a total of 100 units of electricity produced in 1980. In that half of units of electricity was generated by coal, while one-fifth of total units were produced by hydropower and natural gas for each. It's half of the electricity generated through oil(10 units). After two decades, 170 units of electricity generated, where the majority of electricity was produced by coal, 130 units. Moreover, 36 units were produced by hydropower but natural gas and oil sources had noticed a negligible unit.
Secondly, France had a total of 90 units of electricity in 1980. 25 units of electricity were produced by coal and natural gas for each. The sources were oil and nuclear power generated 20 and 15 units of electricity respectively. In 2000,180 units of total electricity produced. In which a quarter of the electricity was generated by coal and oil. However, by natural and hydropower, only 2 units of electricity produced.
- People have long imagined the possibility that life exisists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of Earth what would be the implications of proving that alien life exists 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...by hydropower and natural gas for each. Its half of the electricity generated throu...
^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough oil10 units. After two decades, 170 units of electricity generated, where th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as for, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04504504505 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83318652135 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445945945946 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8240495289 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355231055419 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155815643264 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11225221485 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270544277932 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139106447781 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.