The pie charts below shows units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The pie charts elucidate the number of units which were generated by five fuel sources in Australia and France for the year 1980 and 2000.
Overall, between these years , electricity production in both the counties had risen. amongst them, years in Australia whereas Nuclear power became the most predominant source in France.
First of all, in the year 1980, Australia produced 100 units electricity where half of it did by coal which was the highest and the least one was Oil which generates 10 units. Moreover, Hydro power and Natural resources generated same units of electricity for each 20 units respectively. After the 2 decades, usage of coal augmented drastically and it produced 130 units electricity . Where Natural source risen with 16 units and others were negligible among 170 units in the year 2000.
Secondly, two same figures showed in France electricity production with 25 units for Natural source and Coal. Also, Oil and Nuclear power used for electricity generation where the former one produced 20 units and the latter ones 15 units. However, in the year 2000, Nuclear power became the highest source for production with the figures of 126 units . Furthermore, Oil generate 5 units more than past whereas coals units remain same for electricity production.
- The bar chart show the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projection of 2050
- People have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of earth What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists 61
- The pie charts below shows units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the pie charts elucidate the number of unit...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...d France for the year 1980 and 2000. overall, between these years , electricity prod...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd 2000. overall, between these years , electricity production in both the coun...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Amongst
...duction in both the counties had risen. amongst them, years in Australia whereas Nuclea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...le among 170 units in the year 2000. secondly, two same figures showed in France elec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...production with the figures of 126 units . Furthermore, Oil generate 5 units more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17910447761 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6252229394 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7091423428 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373996709495 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164228102562 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10728628934 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253196467178 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115233169958 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.