The pie charts illustrate amount of electricity manufactured from different resources in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the most significant source of electricity in Australia was coal in both two years, whereas in France coal and gas accounted to the most units of electricity produced in 1980, but nuclear power became the most considerable source of electricity generation in 2000.
In Australia, coal produced 50 units in 1980 and substantially rose to 130 in 2000. In addition, the figure of hydro power increased from 20 units in 1980 to 36 units twenty years later. By contrast, a substantial drop is noticeable in the amount of electricity generated from natural gas in the given period.
As for electricity generation in France, units produced from coal and natural gas stayed at the same rate in 1980. However, nuclear power generated the most units of electricity in 2000. Whilst only 15 units were produced from nuclear power in 1980, this amount upsurged to 126 units at the end of the period.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 82
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 89
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 73
- Traditional food is undergoing great changes and being replaced by new diets What do you think are the reasons and what do you think about this phenomenon 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down resta 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01156069364 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83229916156 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468208092486 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4422792163 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346648997906 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17506173309 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940630741543 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250409998492 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678378180433 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.