The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

A glance at the provided pie charts illustrate the comparation of sources of accessing information in Canada and Australia. In general, it is clearly apparent that television gain the highest popularity in Canada while in Australia, most people access information online.

Looking in more detail from the table, a total of 40% inhabitants in Canada prefer television as their main source for accessing news. Similarly to television users, those who likely to searching information online contribute only 4% lower of the total population. Additionally, the other method for gaining news is printed media which is chosen by 14% of the Canadian while radio only used by a half. On the other hand, more than half Australian people liked to accessing online news while the television watcher counted slightly below the Canadian at 37%. Oppositely, printed media users and radio listeners only reported half or below of the Canada figures at 7% and 2% respectively. Finally, people who not specified their preference in both countries only documented at 2-3%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it is clearly apparent that television gain the highest popularity in Canada wh...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...s their main source for accessing news. Similarly to television users, those who likely t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, similarly, so, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86080494476 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.3907302894 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200669209385 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096952410337 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095073928539 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196655578701 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918385517444 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.