The pie charts give information about the number of sick days the population of an imaginary country took for three dififerent years The line graph shows the amount of money spent on healthcare per person per year from 1970 until 1990

Essay topics:

The pie charts give information about the number of sick days the population of an imaginary country took for three dififerent years. The line graph shows the amount of money spent on healthcare per person per year from 1970 until 1990.

The pie charts depict the number of sick days the population of an imaginary country took in various years, while the line graph shows how much money in US dollars one person spent on healthcare from 1970 until 1990, in five-yearly intervals.
Overall, the percentage of the population who took off 5 to 8 sick days increased gradually and accounted for the highest proportion over time, while the figure for 4-or-fewer-day group decreased almost halve throughout the period. The amount of money the residents spent on healthcare witnessed almost an eightfold increase for the twenty years.
The majority of the population took five to eight sick leave in 1970, at 61%, followed by a gradual growth to 64% in 1980 and 68% in 1990. To a lesser degree, despite a sharp decrease to 11% in 1980, the figure for the longest sick leave saw a slight growth to 22% in 1990. The figure for the shortest sick leave saw a substantial rise from 19% in 1970 to 25% in 1980 but then fell markedly to 10% for the last ten years.
Regarding personal healthcare expense, it began at less than $500 in 1970 and then increased twofold to about $1,000 for the next five years. Then, the figure remained almost stable at around $1,200 in 1980 but later rose dramatically to reach its peak of $4,000 in 1990

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-13 Hayoni Candy 84 view
Essays by user Hayoni Candy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1970 and then increased twofold to about ,000 for the next five years. Then, the f...
^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... figure remained almost stable at around ,200 in 1980 but later rose dramatically ...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r rose dramatically to reach its peak of ,000 in 1990
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62719298246 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50706527032 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1165303877 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35204751136 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150437923333 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141150552304 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227473103906 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166114503229 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.