The pie charts given illustrate how much water was used in percentage over two the year 1997 and 2007 in Sydney, Australia.
Overall, it is evident that the food industry accounted for the largest proportion of total water in both years. Besides, the amount of water used in the service industry in 2007 nearly doubled that of in 1997.
In 1997, 5% of the water used in the building industry, this figure decreased slightly to 2% in the next ten years. Similarly, standing at 48% which took the lead in the total water use in 1997, the food industry saw a minimal fall to 41% in 2007. Also, manufacturing saw a neglectable downward trend from 15% in 1997 to 11% in the following ten years.
In contrast, the statistics of water used in the household rose from 19% in the initial year to 21% in the final year. The service industry constituted 13% of water use in 13%. This number climbed significantly to a quarter over a period of ten years, a growth of two times compared to the data during the year of 1997.
The pie charts given illustrate how much water was used in percentage over two the year 1997 and 2007 in Sydney, Australia.
Overall, it is evident that the food industry accounted for the largest proportion of total water in both years. Besides, the amount of water used in the service industry in 2007 nearly doubled that of in 1997.
In 1997, 5% of the water used in the building industry, this figure decreased slightly to 2% in the next ten years. Similarly, standing at 48% which took the lead in the total water use in 1997, the food industry saw a minimal fall to 41% in 2007. Also, manufacturing saw a neglectable downward trend from 15% in 1997 to 11% in the following ten years.
In contrast, the statistics of water used in the household rose from 19% in the initial year to 21% in the final year. The service industry constituted 13% of water use in 13%. This number climbed significantly to a quarter over a period of ten years, a growth of two times compared to the data during the year of 1997.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The pie charts given illustrate how much water was used in percentage over two the year 1997 and 2007 in Sydney Australia Overall it is evident that the food industry accounted for the largest proportion of total water in both years Besides the amount of 73
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essential of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot overlooked 89
- The pie charts illustrate the proportion of citizens working in three categories in two Towns in two different years 1960 and 2010 It is evident that the number of people working in sales was largest in both towns in 1960 Besides Town A and town B both sa 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48108108108 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51026235537 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9298446959 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559393460028 0.215688989381 259% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22975454718 0.103423049105 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18456552162 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382531017316 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194905355333 0.0819641961636 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.