The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India.
Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.

The pie charts demonstrate the proportions of different kinds of food consumed in the world in 2008 in comparison with two other countries: China and India.

Overall, as can be seen from these charts, processed food made up the most significant contribution while nuts and seeds only accounted for more negligible segments. In China, however, animal food played the least remarkable part in the chart.

In the first chart, the percentage of processed products was above 40%, tenfold that of nuts and seeds. Meanwhile, vegetables and fruits and animal food took up 29% and 26% respectively.

On the other hand, the distributions of processed food and vegetables were equivalent in China, where both of them accounted for slightly more than one-third of the chart. In addition, nuts and seeds made up a 19% proportion while the percentage of animal food was less than that by 4%. In the meantime, the ratio of processed food was almost two-fifths while that of nuts and seeds was roughly one-tenth. Animal food and vegetables & fruits made up a 27% and 23% contribution.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-05 mido2070 78 view
2022-01-05 mido2070 58 view
2021-09-21 stanie calitex 67 view
2019-03-25 ladungkiet 84 view
Essays by user stanie calitex :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06179775281 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83004871753 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3413175054 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170574000703 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818779603473 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798581675676 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130358939795 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927905797183 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.