The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.
The pie charts compare three different nations, namely Argentina, Mexico and Chile, in terms of the percentage breakdown of export merchandises in the 2000 year.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the large majority of Mexico's exports were to the USA, while Argentina and China's goods were distributed more evenly amongst other countries.
From the charts, it can be seen that Argentina and Chile's export trend were almost identical, with the bulk of their exports going to other Latin American regions, at 38% for Argentina and 31 % for Chile. Meanwhile, 26% of the total of Argentina's exports went to European, 16% to the USA and the remaining 20% to the other territories. Similarly, Chile's exports consisted of 30% to European, 18% to the USA, and 21% to the other areas.
In contrast, the primary export market in Mexico was the USA, at 62%. The rest of the exports from Mexico to European, other Latin American and other countries were at 6% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-12 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 70
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- The graph below gives information on the performance of a train company in October and November in 2008 74
- The chart below shows the average cost of the monthly contract for four di erent mobiles cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66169638902 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1974467004 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166450099833 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841258879636 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483438691877 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11287433382 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498012404566 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.