Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think?
It is argued that to reduce the proportion of jobless should only invest in elementary school instead of junior school and higher. In my perspective, I think this is a wrong argument and this essay will present my view on this issue.
Firstly, while grammar schools equip school-aged children with primary knowledge of numerary and literacy, secondary students are provided with basic lessons of diverse fields of science. In secondary schools, students will have opportunities to discover the possibilities and limitations of themselves as well as subjects which they love. From that, they can build a basic job orientation. For example, those who are proficient in languages are likely to become diplomats, translators, tour guides and so on whereas those who excel in the numerical calculation may develop to be accountants, bankers, investors and so forth. Furthermore, secondary education has been significantly proven to play a vital role in the division of labour. Secondly, In a society that values knowledge today, owning advanced degrees is considered a mandatory mission for the young generation. Therefore, sources of knowledge from junior high schools will help to establish the concrete foundation for schoolers to further their education in senior high schools, universities and graduate programs.
On the other hand, if authorities only focus on developing primary schools, students undoubtedly would not have the knowledge and skills to work intellectual works such as scientist, teacher, investor and et cetera. As a result, those people may seek blue-collar employment. In addition, in the era of applying technology in production, robots with artificial intelligence are gradually replacing humans from taking over manual jobs. Thereby, the rate of unemployment in countries where only offer primary education to the majority of students would increase without decreasing.
In conclusion, I believe that regions with a high unemployment level only supporting elementary programs for children will not really effective in reducing the percentage of people out of work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | tr_h.20 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | nnglinh | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | Kien Vu | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 80
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in North America South America Europe and Asia 84
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59433962264 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05838425509 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.751364482 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4285714286 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172399053651 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052529745449 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611044230988 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907150669401 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336470343296 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.