The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003.
The pie chart illustrates the comparison between six different categories, namely natural gas, coal, hydrogen, nuclear power, oil, and so on, in terms of the proportion of energy generated from various sources in one particular country in 1985 and 2003. Overall, it is noticeable that throughout the 17-year period, oil remained the main source of energy production, followed by natural gas and nuclear power, which together with oil constitute a larger proportion of all the sources. By contrast, the other three sources, such as coal, hydrogen, and various kinds of renewable materials, are less used when producing energy.
The data indicates that oil was the most dominant source over the period of 17 years, although the proportion dropped significantly from 52% in 1985 to 39% in 2003. Similarly, nuclear power declined, but less dramatically, by only 5%. Furthermore, an appealing trend could be seen in the fact that hydrogen expenditure remained stable over a 17-year period.
On the contrary, the figure for natural gas grew markedly from 13% to 23% by 2003, surpassing that of nuclear power and becoming the second-most consumed resource in that nation after oil energy. The percentage of coal power and other renewable sources rose markedly, by 5% and 3%, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27669902913 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84065210193 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635922330097 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8205650258 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271035614059 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103656521664 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127802811875 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164789250937 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978078185253 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.