The pie charts show reason why people go to work by bicycle or car
The pie chart illustrate rationales behind cycling and driving by workers. Overall, it is noticeable that impact on health and less pollution is the major reasons why people go to work by bicycle and comfortability is the main motive behind driving to working place.
The larger proportion of worker cycling to work because of it impact on thier health and less pollution, this account for less than a third for each. In contrast to this, two fifths choose to go to work by driving due to comfort they derive from it. Distance from their home to working place is rank second for using car, this represent less than a qauter of total population. 15% of the workers decide to cycling to work because of issue of parking space
On the lesser proportion, need for luggage and faster than bicycle share the same percentage 14% for each reasons. 13% of the staff believe that cycling is faster than driving. However, secure than cycling and no cost is the lowest reason why workers use bicycle and car. The former is just 11% while the later is 12%
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese between 1976 and 2007 67
- The chart below show reason why people go to work by bicycle and car. 73
- The chart below show reason why people go to work NY bicycle or car. 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below show reason why people go to work by bicycle and car. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65945945946 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3518421358 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2584831883 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27090610204 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104306975607 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985795591768 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193348914502 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108521195216 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.