The pie charts demonstrate the comparison of energy production in France between 1995 and 2005. Energy produced by gas, coal, petro, nuclear and other.
In 1995, gas, coal and petro comprised of most energy production, with percentage of 29.63%, 29.80% and 29.27% respectively. Nuclear constituted a small percentage, which is 6.4%. Other source of energy composed 4.9% of energy production. Thus, gas, coal and petro took up big section, whilst nuclear and other source have small section.
In 2005, coal contribute 30.93% of energy production, which is the largest percentage. Followed by gas, the percentage is 30.31%. Petro made up 19.55% of energy production. Nuclear and other source share nearly the same percentage, which is 10.10% and 9.10 percentage respectively.
In comparison between 1995 and 2005, the percentage of coal and gas did not change much. The percentage of petro has decreased from 29.27% to 19.55% from 1995 to 2005. Nuclear and other source increased in ten years. Nuclear increased 3.7% and other source increased 4.2%.
- You recently bought a laptop computer A few days later the laptop stopped working When you took it back the shop they refused to deal with the problem Write a letter to the customer service department at the company s head office including the following i 87
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend 82
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Some teachers say students should be organized into groups to study. Others argue students should be made study alone. Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective ? 73
- The chart below shows the proportions of the world’s oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wh 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...nd 9.10 percentage respectively. In comparison between 1995 and 2005, the percentage o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.320574162679 0.268076937826 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.1004784689 0.116061578633 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0717703349282 0.0759168565197 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0239234449761 0.0366838410393 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.1004784689 0.155750635184 65% => OK
Participles: 0.0239234449761 0.0379272487307 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7071259652 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00956937799043 0.0210936926555 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00956937799043 0.00175180941692 546% => OK
Determiners: 0.0382775119617 0.0948980150116 40% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143540669856 0.00967000014798 148% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1057.0 1161.00487805 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.9 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.36746987952 5.90752243213 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409638554217 0.337110787985 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.246987951807 0.247514529752 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180722891566 0.171178102325 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150602409639 0.112407865282 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7071259652 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487951807229 0.546246751206 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 38.9195851994 49.3433353143 79% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 8.93414634146 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.8571428571 23.0094962315 52% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4850896784 42.9750493124 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 135.714022679 56% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.8571428571 23.0094962315 52% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.214285714286 0.689975730869 31% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 36.5559380379 47.7609492067 77% => OK
Elegance: 3.57692307692 2.94281807926 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294993720399 0.418131533498 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133854238722 0.181151798455 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.173218393254 0.0850326197045 204% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531601973442 0.706616315825 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132623597662 0.157042692854 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139682224702 0.228904883108 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140586034885 0.108899403657 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379452402978 0.367819155151 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0381616690577 0.0812612215331 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235491733904 0.316326947829 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838520447423 0.0921553760075 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70731707317 243% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.16585365854 253% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 7.1512195122 168% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.