The plans bellow show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following plans illustrate various developments that occurred in a public park since 1920.
As can be clearly observed from the plans, the public park experienced many different improvements, the most significant of which took place in the center of the park where the fountain was disappeared and a rose garden alongside seats around are constructed. In addition, the old stage for musicians which was located on the west of the fountain was replaced by Amphitheatre for concerts. Meanwhile, seats on the western side of the park were eliminated and both rose garden and seats on the south of old stage accompanying with seats next to southern entrance of the park were destroyed.
Moreover, pond for water plants on the north-east was removed and replaced by relatively large Children’s play area. Whereas water feature is added near the Elden street entrance is constructed, the glasshouse and seats were removed at the same site. Besides, there are no seats on the west of northern entrance of the park.
It is clear from the plans that today’s plan of the park is more convenient from visitors due to adding a café next to entrance from Arnold avenue and a new entrance on the east of water feature to underground car park which is newly implemented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... the plans, the public park experienced many different improvements, the most significant of w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95305164319 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78392275848 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7053080048 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18561744313 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859395094755 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648859738779 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130067545852 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485064721762 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.