the plans below show how a city center before and how it looks now
The provided maps illustrate the evolution of a city center from its original state in 1950 to its current appearance.
In general, the city has experienced substantial development over time. The population has increased tenfold, and important changes have occurred.
In 1950, the city held 20,000 people. It had a central business area with two main road crossings. However, one road went northwest, unlike the others. North of the business district, there was a residential area, and an airport was located to the east. A bridge spanned the river flowing from the southwest to the southeast, leading to a government building in the south.
Today, the city's population has increased to 200,000. The residential area has significantly expanded, widespread across the city. A new main road was added from the southwest to the middle of the west road. Another business district has emerged in the south, centered around the government building, along with another government building. The river has been turned into a vast lake, with a dam built at the southeastern end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-02 | tr_h.20 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | hien3112 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-24 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the diagrams below show the water supply system in australia at the present and in the future 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where re 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability while others believe that there are more important factors involved in success in sports Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83400919887 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6739255229 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.3076923077 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3076923077 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0648642839078 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229421633854 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303995529494 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0450517164735 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210253646493 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.