the charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that ofpeople using private cars in five austrlian cities between 2000 and 2010
The diagrams illustrate the ratios among individuals in five Australian urban centers who employed either public or private transportation methods during the period spanning from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the preference for private car usage outweighed the inclination towards public transportation across Australia.
In terms of public transport, Brisbane ranked third in 2000, with a percentage of 15%. Subsequently, it steadily increased and reached a peak of 28%, surpassing Melbourne in 2003 and overtaking Sydney in mid-2004. Conversely, Melbourne, Perth, and Adelaide displayed relatively stable figures throughout the ten-year span, with percentages remaining around 18%, 10%, and 5% respectively. While Sydney experienced a slight growth between 2007 and 2009, it leveled off afterwards.
Shifting the focus to private automobiles, Adelaide had the highest percentage, with over 70% of individuals utilizing their private vehicles. Perth and Brisbane had lower percentages, around 60% and 50% respectively, in 2010. In 2000, Melbourne recorded 10% higher private car usage than Sydney, but the situation reversed by mid-2002, with Sydney's figures surpassing Melbourne's. By 2006, Sydney's private car usage reached 40%.
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows five countries where australia students studied from 2004 to 2006 79
- the charts below show the Australian dollars in Australia s trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009 73
- water system in australia now and in the future 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93888888889 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07588690412 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1519408602 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205588880134 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805600994589 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572565129073 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130098988633 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263348022514 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93888888889 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07588690412 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1519408602 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205588880134 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805600994589 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572565129073 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130098988633 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263348022514 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.