The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps describe the changes of Grange Park from its beginning in 1980 to today.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant re-arrangement in the seating area while the entrances and one minor garden remained the same. The park also added and expanded the entertainment areas which included some facilities.
The most substantial transformation of the park is the location of the old fountain and the left side of the park where used to have a stage for musicians. At the present, in the center of the park which was located by a fountain was replaced by a large rose garden surrounded by many seats while the previous stage has been turned into a much larger amphitheatre.
The entrances in the middle have remained unchanged but on the right side, the rose garden has been taken over by a cafe. There is now a children’s play area where a pond for water plants used to be. Instead of the pond, a water feature has been built occupying the bottom right corner which was displaced by a glasshouse and some seats. Finally, there is a new entrance for an underground car park in the lower right corner of the park.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6157635468 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65606335071 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7072621402 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838480767099 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381112184408 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286817663273 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529010505924 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193408710815 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.