Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The last decade has witnessed an escalation in technology development. Using technology to monitor people’s conversations and activities is no longer unfamiliar nowadays. Personally, I am of the opinion that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will attempt to have a closer look at this issue.
To begin with, it is the fact that applying technology in our life could offer huge benefits. Firstly, using technology as a protector to create a safe life for human beings. To illustrate, people who live alone should install security cameras in their houses to check whether thieves break into their house and attack them when they’re back home. Secondly, a technology monitor can help police whenever a kidnap happens. That is to say, location tracking is helpful for policemen to rescue people. In brief, there are numerous profits of monitoring by technology.
Howbeit, there would also be the presence of some drawbacks. For example, crime may use it to support their illegal actions, such as attacking the security systems of citizen’s houses to collect their private videos. However, we can reduce this risk by turning off the cameras when at home.
To conclude then, despite the downsides of this issue being existent, I am completely in favor of the advantages of bringing from monitored technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nology monitor can help police whenever a kidnap happens. That is to say, location track...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in brief, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 213.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28169014085 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86404217009 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.680751173709 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8615722698 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3571428571 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259123211839 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758901969171 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426064412277 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142226729561 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261158792906 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.