The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures compare the change of grange park in1920 and the appearance now.
It is clear that the grange park has been changed a lot today. Pond for water plants, fountain, glasshouse and stage for musicians have been removed but also built some new facilities such as amphitheatre for concerts, café, children’s play area, water feature and underground car park.
In 1920, from the entrance on Arnold Avenue, we can see that rose garden and pond for water plants on the right side of entrance while today’s grange park replaced both areas which are café and children’s plants. On the other side of entrance were seats, rose garden and on the top left corner had seats, but the public park today only kept rose garden in the same place.
Walk in from the Eldon Street entrance, there were the fountain right in the middle and the stage for musicians just on the left. By contracts, 4 seats around rose garden and amphitheatre for concerts in the grange park today. On the left side of Eldon Street entrance has same structure as the left side of Arnold Avenue entrance in 1920 but no longer there in today’s public park. Look at right side of Eldon Street entrance, there was a glasshouse now changed to water feature. Go a bit further towards above bottom right corner were seats and now become an entrance for underground park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have to many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life what are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33053352577 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1910706792 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154821380976 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763061696216 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478266283705 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102607685614 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162807518535 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.