The maps below depict the layout of public park in two different years, 1920 and 2020. Overall, it is readily apparent that a lot of modification has been done to the park during 100 years.
In detail, starting from the left side of the park, it can be seen that the 1920's Stage for Musicians has been replaced by Amphitheatre for Concerts in 2020. Then, the bottom-left Rose Garden has been replaced to the center of the Park, along with all the Seats, which are now surrounding the Rose Garden. Meanwhile, the upper-left Rose Garden remained the same. Furthermore, in the center of the Park, the Fountain is now unavailable as a result of the movement of Rose Garden.
Moving to the right side of the park, it can be seen that on the upper side, another Rose Garden is now replaced by a Cafe, and Pond for Water Plants has been altered into Children's play area. Next, on the bottom side, Seats and Glasshouse are now replaced and as a result, a Water Feature is constructed in that location. Lastly, an Underground Park is also built, with an entrance near the Water Feature.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, lastly, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58762886598 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48094020487 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8806862504 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118492946763 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589917012328 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395666082494 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928279344937 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390098049699 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.