The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps illustrate changes which has occurred in Grange park since 1920.

Overall, only the rose garden in the northeast corner and the two entrances have remained unchanged in nearly a century.

Since 1920, people have always entered Grange park via two gateways: one at Arnold Avenue in the northern side, the other in the opposite side at Eldon street. In the past, after going through the entrance, visitors would saw a fountain at the central area. This fountain has now been replaced by a rose garden surrounded with seats. Turning left from the entrance at Eldon street, there used to be a stage for musicians with seating and rose gardens on three sides. This stage and its surrounding, except for the rose garden in the northern side, had been upgraded into an enormous amphitheatre which is able to hold concerts. On the other side of the park, a glasshouse with viewing seats on the southwest corner have been destroyed to construct a water feature. A pond for water plans and a rose garden in the adjation corner in the 1920's map has also disappeared in the recent plan to make place for a children's playground and a coffes shop.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-28 MinyiChu 73 view
2024-02-28 MinyiChu 56 view
2024-01-28 Wardiati Yusuf 73 view
2023-11-30 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-10-01 Kshitij Kasabekar 67 view
Essays by user haiduong :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grange) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...1920, people have always entered Grange park via two gateways: one at Arnold Avenue ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.745 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4306326337 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8756425503 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0743434020991 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336825270649 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040735630369 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589476341567 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472321593091 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.