The plans below show a theatre in 2010 and 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The two maps delineate the obvious renovations of a theatre between 2010 and 2012. Generally, what stands out from the maps is that the theatre has been innovated considerably into a more developed area with a great expansion of facilities.
In 2010, the theatre was centered around a large auditorium which is remained the same in 2012 with a large dressing room space behind it and a small storage area in the top right corner. By 2012, the storage room has moved to the bottom left corner in favor of an admin office, whereas the dressing room has been relocated to a smaller room in a new section of the building on the top left corner which also includes a room for showers. Replacing the dressing room was a coordination area.
In the year 2012, a large restaurant had opened at the entrance, taking previously empty space and demanding the relocation of the administration and ticket offices (the former was to the right of the office, displacing a cafe). Since 2010, the main door has remained unchanged, and no further changes have been made.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | Tường Vân | view | |
| 2024-05-07 | Tường Vân | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-31 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-31 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The diagram details the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 36
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63850719666 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7666472807 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101241309031 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547394065773 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465248868058 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729922898635 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208644769696 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.