The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The given maps shed lights on the reconstruction of a cinema in 2010 and 2012.
As can be seen from the maps, the whole cinema had experienced a remarkable transformation during the two-year period even though there is no additional auditorium seats.
When it comes to the South area of the cinema, the ticket office, which used to be on the left hand side of the main entrance had been moved to the South-East corner to make room for a new restaurants in 2012. Given the same period, the admin office had been repositioned to the furthest left corner of the customer service zone.
In terms of the North side, in 2010, the small central stage was surrounded by a front auditorium, a back media room and a left-winged storage. While the auditorium stayed intact after two years, the main stage was enlarged with the addition of a brand-new hall at the back. Time period witnessed the relocation of the media and storage to the left-winged and right-winged of the building respectively. Besides, people also erected showers next to the media with a view to satisfy customers’ demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-02 | tr_h.20 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | hien3112 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-24 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate at least five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2002 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle Both school and parents are responsible for solving this problem To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83422459893 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.838680787 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614973262032 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2373296536 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746102801742 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423272372767 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058312513654 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057362842441 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591834304088 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83422459893 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.838680787 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614973262032 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2373296536 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746102801742 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423272372767 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058312513654 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057362842441 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591834304088 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.