The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012
The diagrams compare the differences between the setup of a theater between 2010 and 2012.
Overall, the theater in 2010 was less spacious than the one in 2012 with 8 rooms, while the 2012's version of the complex consists of 10 rooms.
In 2010, theater-visitors entered throungh the main door to an empty space, whereas in 2012, the door lead directly to a restaurant. The ticket office was moved from the left of the main door to the right, replacing the cafe that stood there in 2010. To the left of the entrance in 2012, a storage occupied the place of the former ticket office. While the auditorium experienced no major reconstruction during the 2010 - 2012 period, the stage was enlarged.
As part of the extension of the building in 2012, a shower was provided to the left of the stage. In 2010, there was a large dressing room behind the stage: however, in 2012, the dressing room was relocated to the left - upper corner of the floor and was replaced by a coordination. The right - upper corner, where the storage used to be in 2010, was transformed into an admin office.
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Prison is the best punishment for criminals Discuss 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 73
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65625 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59649285536 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4097010036 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241087719231 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118953098154 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969765131347 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192685414443 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109367305453 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.