Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas are used in many countries. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power is encouraged. Is this trend a positive or negative development?
Ever since fossil fuels were discovered, they have become one of the main resources and valuable material for the majority of territories. Humans use fossil fuels to run motors in cars, or to generate electricity in thermal power stations. As the demand of energy worldwide is increasing, the strains on the existing and already limited resources also sky-rocket. With the advancement in the technology field, alternative sources of energy such as wind or solar power are now capable of replacing fossil fuels and switching to these types of energy are strongly encouraged. In my opinion, this trend is a positive development. In this essay, I plan to support my statement with clear evidence and examples.
Firstly, by alternating coal and oil with wind or solar power in certain circumstances, the use of non-renewable resources can be significantly reduced so that we can invest more of them in more important projects such as space explorations or prehistoric research. Nowadays, most fossil fuels are utilised in transporting or generating electricity, which can be quite wasteful as renewable energy origins perform just as well. Research shows that in 2014, the USA consumed the most oil globally with just under 1 billion litre, most of which was spent producing petrol for cars. Overall, reducing the use of fossil fuels benefits humanity by saving energy sources for industries in which coal and oil are irreplaceable.
Moreover, overusing and over-exploiting fossil fuels cause multiple types of pollution. Exhaust gas emitted by car engines discharges large amounts of poisonous substances such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, etc. and many more. These toxic chemical compounds can lead to air pollution and harm people's health, causing respiratory issues and even lung cancer. According to a study, exhaust gas from motor engines in general shoulders the responsibility for 30% of air pollution in Hanoi. Exploiting oil under the ocean damages the living habitat of many sea creatures and transporting oil on ships pose a threat in catastrophic oil leaking accidents, which kills innumerable animals yearly. In general, using fossil fuels harms us in many aspects.
Another positivity about switching to renewable energy resources is that we are less dependent on fossil fuels. Countries such as Japan and Germany are not abundant in coal or oil. Because of that, they are totally dependent on the USA or UAE to import energy sources. This process of course costs an enormous amount of money. Furthermore, fossil fuels need millions of years to form, it is universally acknowledged that they are running out. If we start investing into these alternative energy origins now, we will not have to worry about the energy shortage anymore.
In conclusion, encouraging countries' governments to start developing alternative sources of energy in my point of view, is a positive move as it brings about many beneficial merits both at the moment and in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | lelete | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | lelete | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | trangtb2k5 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | claraa_ltn | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | claraa_ltn | 73 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 84
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this What should ben done to encourage people to protect the environment 89
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Prison is the best punishment for criminals Discuss 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people from using cars 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in general, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 477.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27882599581 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92580617243 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7291177974 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413013031427 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100366294892 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766874684628 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207401287176 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446989775907 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.